Dev is required to receive commit messages in any case.
The real question is whether there's a need to receive issues email
even if you are not on the dev mailing list. That'd be the only
reason to have a separate list.
I'm for flexibility, so I'm +1 for it.
On 3/16/06, Cris Daniluk <cris.danilu..mail.com> wrote:
> I don't think that our issue volume is so great that it warrants a separate
> list... we have a lot of discussions on -devel triggered off of those JIRA
> emails, too.
>
>
> On 3/16/06, Bill Dudney <bdudne..pache.org> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm getting the mailing lists request set up on JIRA..apache and I
> > ran into another group that got an 'issues' list for their JIRA
> > instance to send email to. Do we want that? If so I'll request it and
> > have the dev list be subscribed initially.
> >
> > TTFN,
> >
> > Bill Dudney
> > MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
> > Cayenne -
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Mar 16 2006 - 10:51:01 EST