Re: issues mailing list?

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..mail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 17 2006 - 11:20:45 EST

  • Next message: Bill Dudney: "Re: issues mailing list?"

    Just to clarify, cayenne-dev under Apache will be required to receive
    all scm messages, and the cayenne-pmc members will be required to be
    reading them. Part of the responsibility of being a pmc member is
    that you insure that code checked in meets apache standards (generally
    legal licensing issues) and you cannot be doing that if you're not
    watching all commits. At least this is my understanding. Probably
    another thing to ask for clarification on in the incubator.

    At least under MyFaces, all jira changes are sent to the dev list.
    This has actually been quite helpful to me. There have been times
    when what was going on in an issue impacts something else I've been
    working on or vice-versa, even though I would never have monitored the
    issue under other circumstances. It also makes it more obvious when
    a few "me toos" get posted to an issue -- if you only see the initial
    issue request, then you really don't get a feel for those.

    I don't know that redirecting all jira comments to dev is a
    requirement of apache, though. I'd hope that if it is not, we could
    at least set up another mailing list for people to opt-in to receive
    all jira change messages.

    On 3/17/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > Just a clarification regarding current setup (which I agree is appropriate
    > for the future as well):
    >
    > 1. New jira issues are posted to cayenne-devel.
    > 2. Comments or other status messages are NOT posted to cayenne-devel and
    > are only sent to the Jira users assocaited with the issue.
    > 3. CVS commits are sent to cayenne-cvs (not dev, as Mike suggested). We
    > already requested to create cayenne-scm list on Apache, that will be the
    > analogue of current cayenne-cvs.
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    >
    > > I agree with Cris. Seems like therešs no real need for another list.
    > >
    > > --
    > > Kevin
    > >
    > > On 3/16/06 10:07 AM, "Cris Daniluk" <cris.danilu..mail.com> wrote:
    > >
    > >> I don't think that our issue volume is so great that it warrants a
    > >> separate
    > >> list... we have a lot of discussions on -devel triggered off of those
    > >> JIRA
    > >> emails, too.
    > >>
    > >> On 3/16/06, Bill Dudney <bdudne..pache.org> wrote:
    > >>> Hi All,
    > >>>
    > >>> I'm getting the mailing lists request set up on JIRA..apache and I
    > >>> ran into another group that got an 'issues' list for their JIRA
    > >>> instance to send email to. Do we want that? If so I'll request it and
    > >>> have the dev list be subscribed initially.
    > >>>
    > >>> TTFN,
    > >>>
    > >>> Bill Dudney
    > >>> MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
    > >>> Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Mar 17 2006 - 11:20:47 EST