I agree. I haven't thought much further beyond the need to preserve
all our data. I'll check with Jeff.
Andrus
On Apr 17, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
> I don't think we're really using anything that would make a
> compelling case
> for a standalone instance... no highly custom workflow, plugins, etc.
>
>
> On 4/17/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienen..mail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/17/06, Jean T. Anderson <jt..ristowhill.com> wrote:
>>> Since Jeff has presumably set up other Apache projects similarly,
>>> maybe
>>> he has more ideas on how to integrate it better with the rest of
>>> Apache.
>>> For example, it would be nice if Cayenne could be listed with other
>>> projects at http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
>>> and in
>>> the project pull down at
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa .
>>
>> As much as I hate to say it, I think Cayenne will be better off in
>> the
>> long run as part of the core apache issue tracker rather than a
>> separate instance. Being on a separate instance is just asking for
>> trouble (maintenance, downtime, intra-project issue tracking).
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 17 2006 - 11:37:27 EDT