It looks like recommending SVK per Kevin's SVK suggestion is a good
idea - there won't be a need for the external repo, and it will
remove the reviewing bottleneck from the patch process.
Andrus
On May 24, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 5/24/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>> This depends on the project type - when you are enhancing the
>> existing code, this is manageable. When you are writing a new
>> application, using small patches is doable but not practical - it
>> will generate lots of noise.
>
> Noise is better than big code dumps that don't get reviewed, in my
> experience. It's also more representative of the way people generally
> are expected to work on an open source project.
>
> -garrett
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 24 2006 - 14:18:34 EDT