On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> looks good -- and I updated the cayenne status.
Great, thanks!
> Regarding the Confluence migration, I understand from infrastructure@
> that Confluence isn't supposed to be used as a general purpose
> wiki. It
> was installed for committers to maintain the static, published, web
> site.
Actually, the only other project using Confluence, Geronimo, uses it
as a main Wiki (at least the "Wiki" link from the main G. site points
to Confluence). So I hope this is not so.
I haven't seen any mention that Confluence at Apache wasn't intended
to be a general purpose Wiki, but rather that it doesn't scale very
well. And the static site plugin (not sure what it is called exactly)
was supposed to address this issue.
> Would Cayenne also like a MoinMoin wiki for general purpose use?
We had a discussion on that some time back and there was a desire to
preserve Confluence as a Wiki, the main reason being that we are
using it as a documentation engine (relying on its export feature),
but also because it more feature-rich in general, and we have lots of
Confluence content already.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Jul 16 2006 - 13:37:01 EDT