Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:06 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
...
>>> and before Windows build LGPL dependency [2] is resolved?
>>
>>
>> I think the JIRA has is correct. You cannot distribute any LGPL code
>> from Apache, so you would have to have the user download, install,
>> and link the launcher with your executable. It doesn't sound like
>> your "binary" distribution can easily use this technique, though. So
>> you would need either an alternative technology or a distribution of
>> code and a process to link the pieces together. Good luck (I'm not
>> familiar with the technology enough to help you here).
>
> I think Roller released with LGPL dependencies, so there is a
> precedent. But I am with you on the general idea that we shouldn't rush
> it until it is ready. In practical terms it means we will need to
> branch 2.0 (our "ObjectStyle -> Apache migration helper release"), and
> continue developing 3.0 on HEAD, while we resolve all the things above.
>
oops, I hit send on my reply before I saw Craig's and yours replies, so
my post is crossing a bit with yours. Roller released with an LGPL
dependency? That'd be good to nail down in the archives.
-jean
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jul 17 2006 - 23:31:56 EDT