Re: [m2] directory structure

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Fri Jul 21 2006 - 13:58:18 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [m2] directory structure"

    > However, I don't think they have to remain in a directory named
    > .settings, do they?

    I think this is an Eclipse naming convention, so it has to be .settings.

    > And even if they do, we can always go back to
    > our original process where we kept these in a contrib/eclipse
    > directory.

    True. I'd say keep .classpath, .project and .settings in each project
    root directory until it cases a problem to somebody. This allows to
    quickly restore the workspace from scratch, so it is about
    productivity and consistency.

    Andrus

    On Jul 21, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:

    > On 7/21/06, Bill Dudney <bdudne..ac.com> wrote:
    >> I'd prefer to keep the .settings stuff on the wiki as exported xml
    >> files. Anyone using Eclipse could then import the xml files.
    >>
    >> But I'm open to keeping the .settings file around, only problem
    >> would be if NetBeans or whatever decided they also used the same
    >> name directory and we had a conflict.
    >
    > No, I'd rather see these in the repository.
    >
    > However, I don't think they have to remain in a directory named
    > .settings, do they? And even if they do, we can always go back to
    > our original process where we kept these in a contrib/eclipse
    > directory.
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jul 21 2006 - 13:58:41 EDT