Re: main pom...

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sat Jul 22 2006 - 12:40:41 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [JIRA] Created: (CAY-604) rop-browser update 3"

    On Jul 22, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:

    > Hi All,
    >
    > I've checked in the first cut at a main pom.
    >
    > If you could take a look at it and make sure nothing is glaringly
    > wrong.

    Looks good to me. I just updated the version (current version is 3.0
    - it jumped up a bit from 1.2 due to Apache migration), and added
    some missing closing tags.

    > Also, developers add yourselves to the developers list. I got time
    > zone info here (Andrus I made yours up as I don't know where you
    > are :-)

    Yeah, I still travel between the time zones occasionally. Now I am in
    GMT -5 - so you got it right :-)

    > emma - 2.0.5312 is avalible via maven, we call for emma-2.1.5214 in
    > our ant dependencies
    > hsqldb - 1.8.0.4 in maven, 1.8.0.2 in our dependencies
    > jgoodies-forms 1.0.{4&5} in maven 1.0.3 in our dependencies
    > jgroups 2.2.5 is in the maven repo, 2.2.7 is what we need
    > mockrunner maven 0.3.1 we specify 0.2.9

    I think it is safe to bump the versions of all these jars up to the
    ones that you've mentioned.

    > jms is in maven 1.0.2 we specify 1.0.2b (should we switch to the
    > geronimo jms jars?)

    +1 for switching to G. jars.
    > scope is only in the objectstyle repo, anything we can do about that?

    I suggest to point to the ObjectStyle repo - I wanted to get rid of
    this dependency long time ago. Maybe in this release cycle we'll
    finally do it.

    > jgoodies-looks 1.2.2 is in maven, we need 1.3.1 (I've sent a
    > message to the looks project on java.net)

    Great. In the meantime we can also use ObjectStyle repo.

    BTW, we can probably contribute missing jars to ibiblio ourselves if
    that becomes a problem.

    Andrus



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Jul 22 2006 - 12:41:04 EDT