Bill,
Your plan sounds ok to me (personally I'll be working on cayenne-jpa
module at this time, so my work won't even be affected). We expected
some disruption and now is a good time to do it. I am also against
branching.
One more change that we might do while we are at it - our current
test case classes are using *Tst suffix. Maven (and generally
accepted) naming convention is to use *Test. So we might also change
those.
Andrus
On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:07 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
> HI All,
>
> The move to a maven directory layout is going to be disruptive and
> I wanted to get everyone's take on how to handle it.
>
> for example;
>
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/lib - to be removed
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/lib-src - to be removed
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/cayenne - to be moved to ..
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/cayenne - to be moved to ..
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/dvmodeler - to be moved to ..
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/modeler - to be moved to ..
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/regression - to be moved to their
> respective projects?
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/tests - moved into their respective
> projects?
>
> Then once all the modules are moved there will be similar moves
> within each directory, i.e;
>
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/cayenne/dtd/*.dtd -> main/cayenne/cayenne-
> java/cayenne/src/main/resources
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/cayenne/resources/* -> main/cayenne/
> cayenne-java/cayenne/src/main/resources
> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/cayenne/java -> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/
> cayenne/src/main/java
>
> I'm getting started today and hope to be done by late tomorrow with
> the first cut (i.e. a build that gets a jar file into a local repo)
> that we can build on.
>
> It would be easiest for me to check things in incrementally (i.e.
> do one module at a time and check it in) with everyone
> understanding that the build will be hosed for a time. This is
> probably not the best way for our users but I wanted to get your
> take, would it be ok for the build to be hosed for a couple of days
> to a week? The other option of course is to branch but then we have
> to pull everything up from the main line into the branch. The
> Geronimo team went this way and its working OK but its not fun.
>
> Does anyone have any major outstanding changes that will be hard to
> merge as a result of these moves? If so can they be checked in now?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jul 26 2006 - 09:22:22 EDT