OK after a brief chat with Andrus we got things straightned out and
I'll be making the first commit in a moment which will hose the build
for a bit.
I'll post again when its all done.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Jul 27, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
> Hi Andrus,
>
> I was just about to commit a bunch of changes to cayenne-java. Is
> now a good time?
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:43 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Bill,
>>
>> could you please post a note to the list when you start moving
>> folders around? I started working on some changes related to the
>> pluggable query cache, so I may be checking in the code to cayenne-
>> java.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:07 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
>>
>>> HI All,
>>>
>>> The move to a maven directory layout is going to be disruptive
>>> and I wanted to get everyone's take on how to handle it.
>>>
>>> for example;
>>>
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/lib - to be removed
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/lib-src - to be removed
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/cayenne - to be moved to ..
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/cayenne - to be moved to ..
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/dvmodeler - to be moved to ..
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/modeler - to be moved to ..
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/regression - to be moved to their
>>> respective projects?
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/src/tests - moved into their respective
>>> projects?
>>>
>>> Then once all the modules are moved there will be similar moves
>>> within each directory, i.e;
>>>
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/cayenne/dtd/*.dtd -> main/cayenne/
>>> cayenne-java/cayenne/src/main/resources
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/cayenne/resources/* -> main/cayenne/
>>> cayenne-java/cayenne/src/main/resources
>>> main/cayenne/cayenne-java/cayenne/java -> main/cayenne/cayenne-
>>> java/cayenne/src/main/java
>>>
>>> I'm getting started today and hope to be done by late tomorrow
>>> with the first cut (i.e. a build that gets a jar file into a
>>> local repo) that we can build on.
>>>
>>> It would be easiest for me to check things in incrementally (i.e.
>>> do one module at a time and check it in) with everyone
>>> understanding that the build will be hosed for a time. This is
>>> probably not the best way for our users but I wanted to get your
>>> take, would it be ok for the build to be hosed for a couple of
>>> days to a week? The other option of course is to branch but then
>>> we have to pull everything up from the main line into the branch.
>>> The Geronimo team went this way and its working OK but its not fun.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any major outstanding changes that will be hard
>>> to merge as a result of these moves? If so can they be checked in
>>> now?
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> TTFN,
>>>
>>> -bd-
>>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jul 27 2006 - 18:54:44 EDT