I've reopened the issue since we should also apply the patch to 2.0
for consistency.
On 8/16/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienen..mail.com> wrote:
> Wow, that was a painful patch to apply. I finally had to go find
> your commit message and copy the patch out of that :-)
>
> But it's applied and the tests all pass (and diffing against 3.0 HEAD
> shows no unexpected differences).
>
> On 8/16/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> > This is one of the patches that I didn't bother to apply to 1.2. Feel
> > free to do that:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-628
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> >
> > On Aug 16, 2006, at 6:03 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> >
> > > Ok. Now that I've got the tests running again for STABLE-1.2 , I see
> > > that the only thing failing is
> > > org.objectstyle.cayenne.xml.XMLEncoderTst tests.
> > >
> > > This is on a windows 2000 box.
> > >
> > > The only test that passes is testObjectWithNullProperties.
> > >
> > > Are these failures expected?
> > >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Aug 16 2006 - 18:51:29 EDT