-1 because of #3 & potentially #4
here are a few of things that I noticed;
1) the .sh files in the bin directory are not executable
2) the jar names in the lib dir do not have 'incubating' in the name
- this might be an issue with the incubator pmc but we do have
'incubating' in the root of the directory structure so it's probably ok
3) i could not find the jgoodies, jdom, ongl, scopemvc or hsqldb
license files or references anywhere. From what I could find here;
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
it looks to me like we need to explicitly point out that this stuff
is not from apache
I looked at the struts release (1.3.5) and they simply put a pointer
to the antlr site from their NOTICE file which I think will be good...
4) the jar files don't have LICENSE & NOTICE files in the META-INF
folder - it could be unimportant for these jars as they are not
shipped separately, but the maven repo probably needs them (and yes I
need to get that done)
I'm open to a +1 cause it runs like a champ. but this legal stuff is
important and I'd hate for our first incubating release to get
smacked :-)
Thanks again Andrus for all your hard work on this!
TTFN,
-bd-
On Sep 18, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
> 2.0.1-incubating release.
>
> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
>
> * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
> Cayenne 1.2.1.
> * the release has no known IP issues
> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license dependencies
> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
>
> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it
> out for the Incubator PMC vote.
>
> Thanks
> Andrus
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Sep 20 2006 - 03:44:30 EDT