[ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
[ ] 0 Don't know or care
[ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new snapshots
are posted here:
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote
attempt:
* Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
* Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I copied
the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does not list
third party licenses text, but mentions all included dependencies and
their web sites).
* Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
binary form).
* Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
* Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
Please review the new files and cast your vote.
(And here is my +1)
Andrus
On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
> 2.0.1-incubating release.
>
> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
>
> * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
> Cayenne 1.2.1.
> * the release has no known IP issues
> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license dependencies
> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
>
> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it
> out for the Incubator PMC vote.
>
> Thanks
> Andrus
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Sep 23 2006 - 17:50:29 EDT