Craig, you are absolutely right - this is exactly what I meant by
'getting too excited' :-)
Andrus
On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Andrus,
>
> Yes, there is a difference between consensus to make a release
> (begin the release process) and approval of a release (after the
> release artifacts are available for testing etc.).
>
> I'd suggest using the [VOTE] subject only for the approval. Seems
> like lazy consensus is sufficient to begin the process. If there is
> a need to get lots of input to begin, you might tag the discussion
> thread with [DISCUSS], but that's just to call attention to the
> mail...
>
> Craig
>
> On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:37 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Another note (something I overlooked, getting too excited about
>> the first release from Apache and all that). We'll still have to
>> do all the due diligence once the release artifacts are posted,
>> ensuring that (a) they work and (b) there are no legal issues,
>> like missing license headers and all that.
>>
>> So we will have another (consequential) vote once a release admin
>> (I guess that's me at the moment) posts the release files.
>>
>> Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jan 05 2007 - 07:56:11 EST