I'm +1 for both 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 if the FrontBase failure isn't serious
enough to warrant fixing first.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 1/11/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> VOTE: approve 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 releases.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.2/
>
>
> I posted artifacts for 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 releases. Note that 1.2.2 is
> not "Apache-compliant" and will be released from SourceForge. There
> is no signatures for 1.2.2 artifacts either. Still doing a vote on
> the entire thing, as the code is maintained by the same group of
> committers.
>
> Kevin and myself did some regression testing. The results are shown
> below. If you have access to Oracle, Sybase or DB2, you may run tests
> from the corresponding tags and report the results.
>
> 1.2.2:
> hsqldb (passed)
> derby (passed)
> mysql (passed)
> postgresql (passed)
> frontbase (one failure [1])
> sqlserver (passed)
>
> 2.0.2:
> hsqldb (passed)
> derby (passed)
> mysql (passed)
> postgresql (passed)
> frontbase (one failure [1])
> sqlserver (passed)
>
> Andrus
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-729
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Jan 13 2007 - 19:22:40 EST