Re: New SVN is ready

From: Michael Gentry (blacknex..mail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 19 2007 - 13:10:55 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "SVN migration starting"

    "project" or "subproject" or "module" or "component" or ... whatever. :-)

    /dev/mrg

    On 1/19/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > Sounds ok. If there are no other suggestions till Sunday, I'll use
    > "unpublished".
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    >
    > On Jan 19, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
    >
    > > How about unpublished instead of private?
    > >
    > >
    > > On 1/19/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> On Jan 19, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    > >>
    > >> > Seems fairly logical, but Subversion allows us to move things
    > >> around
    > >> > if it needs to be changed again.
    > >>
    > >> True, just trying not to do it too often to avoid upsetting local
    > >> Eclipse workspaces.
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> > I am a little confused by the "private" in the names, though.
    > >> Maybe I
    > >> > just don't understand what you were trying to do, but the term
    > >> seems
    > >> > to imply non-open source to me, which of course is not correct.
    > >>
    > >> Interesting, of course nothing like that was implied. "private" here
    > >> means that the module at deployment time will be a part of another
    > >> aggregated module. Such module should not be published as a
    > >> standalone module in a public repository and should not be imported
    > >> by Cayenne users directly. Just like a "private" variable in Java.
    > >> Again, "private" == "do not publish in the repo".
    > >>
    > >> But then, I am not sure what Maven recommended practices are in this
    > >> respect. This is totally my invention coming of a need to provide
    > >> user-friendly modules (cayenne-client, cayenne-server) - the idea
    > >> that breaks neat and clean Maven picture of the world :-)
    > >>
    > >> Andrus
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jan 19 2007 - 13:11:29 EST