I think we should remove the two comments at the bottom of the page.
We've documented the use of m2eclipse at the top, and we no longer use
ant in the context of this page.
On 3/1/07, Mike Kienenberger <mkienen..mail.com> wrote:
> I took a look at the svn folder layout.
>
> - jpa-chapter-* and pojo are integration tests? Definitely not
> obvious from the module names.
>
> I also don't understand the difference between assemblies and build-tools.
>
> I see both a modeler and a framework/cayenne-modeler directory.
>
> I see maven-cayenne-plugin in the framework directory. Isn't this a
> build-tool/assembly?
>
> I see the regression/profiler in build tools. How is that different
> from integration tests as a separate directory.
>
> There's no breakdown between JPA-specific pieces and classic Cayenne.
> There's also no break out of the ROP stuff. Since these various
> pieces are in separate modules, I would think a module description
> would keep them separate as well. I'm sure it's a matter of
> perspective. My organization of the module list on the eclipse page
> was an attempt to answer this question: "If I want to work on X,
> which modules do I need?" I don't think I answered it in full, but it
> looks like a better answer than following the svn layout.
>
> On 3/1/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 28, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> >
> > > I've updated the confluence page.
> > > Hopefully others will review my guesses at the modules.
> > > I also added my unresolved eclipse issues at the bottom of the page.
> >
> >
> > Nice start. Although the module categorization breakdown seems
> > arbitrary. I suggest to follow the SVN folder layout when listing the
> > modules:
> >
> > cayenne/framework/cayenne-agent
> > cayenne/framework/cayenne-client
> > ....
> > cayenne/itests/itest-common
> > ....
> >
> > Andrus
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 11:52:51 EST