RE: Copyright years

From: Kevin Menard (kmenar..ervprise.com)
Date: Mon Apr 23 2007 - 13:45:08 EDT

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Copyright years"

Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Copyright years"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Copyright years"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Copyright years"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Copyright years"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Right. I'm only talking about files that we change, since in theory the
same changes should be reflected in both 1.2.x and 2.0.x. The only real
difference between them should be the different package structure.

-- 
Kevin 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienen..mail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:39 PM
> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Copyright years
> 
> I think legally you are only supposed to update the copyright 
> of a file if you make changes to that file.  However, I am 
> not a lawyer.

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Copyright years"
Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Copyright years"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Copyright years"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Copyright years"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Copyright years"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 23 2007 - 13:46:43 EDT