The copyright policy of Apache changed last year so the copyright
year is only in the NOTICE part of the code. The actual code files
don't have a copyright year at all. They just have a license
statement, so this discussion is really only for a file or two where
the actual copyright notices appear.
Craig
On Apr 23, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Right. I'm only talking about files that we change, since in
> theory the
> same changes should be reflected in both 1.2.x and 2.0.x. The only
> real
> difference between them should be the different package structure.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienen..mail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:39 PM
>> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Copyright years
>>
>> I think legally you are only supposed to update the copyright
>> of a file if you make changes to that file. However, I am
>> not a lawyer.
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russel..un.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 23 2007 - 13:51:38 EDT