Re: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Thu May 10 2007 - 11:35:25 EDT

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "RE: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)"

    Talking of which - we need one more vote from a PMC member. Any of
    the remaining members have time to check the release and vote?

    Andrus

    On May 10, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    > IMO you are correct - only PMC member votes are binding. But there
    > are two things to note in this respect: (1) input from committers
    > is always taken into account - I don't think there's been instances
    > when we ignored such input on matters requiring a vote; (2) PMC is
    > not some elite caste - IMO we should expand/contract it as needed
    > to include people who contribute to the project and to the
    > community. And in fact I am planning to act on item (2).
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    >
    > On May 10, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
    >> Hmm . . . I just reviewed the voting procedure and noticed that
    >> technically my +1 is non-binding. Do we make the distinction between
    >> PMC members and committers for project releases?
    >>
    >> --
    >> Kevin
    >>
    >>> -----Original Message-----
    >>> From: Kevin Menard
    >>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:32 PM
    >>> To: 'de..ayenne.apache.org'
    >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3
    >>>
    >>> +1
    >>>
    >>> FYI, I was involved in the release process and tested 2.0.3
    >>> against HSQLDB, Derby, PostgreSQL 8.2, and MySQL 5. All
    >>> worked for me.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> Kevin
    >>
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu May 10 2007 - 11:35:44 EDT