Re: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)

• Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)"
• In reply to: Michael Gentry: "Re: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)"
• Next in thread: Kevin Menard: "RE: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On May 10, 2007, at 6:43 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> I *could* just add an obligatory +1, but
> that doesn't feel right and I was hoping others had more time to do
> abetter
> checkout.

agreed

> The only thing I noticed when I took a very quick cursory look is
> that the 1.2.3 release Tore put together doesn't have checksum
> files, but I
> consider this a non-issue.

Yep - we just following our old pre-apache release procedure that
didn't include checksums or sigs.

Andrus

• Next message: Kevin Menard: "RE: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)"
• Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)"
• In reply to: Michael Gentry: "Re: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)"
• Next in thread: Kevin Menard: "RE: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu May 10 2007 - 11:46:56 EDT