On May 30, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> The only use I can see for it is a *coincidental* match between
> groups of attributes in multiple tables. So is it worth
> complicating the mapping by introducing a concept with no analog in
> the DB world? My suspicion is that it will be very hard to explain
> to the users.
More on coincidental part. It will only occur in denormalized
schemas, as DB "schema reuse" is done via normalization. So it is an
edge case.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 30 2007 - 05:26:23 EDT