I don't mind resurrecting QueryUtils, but is a count method the only thing
that would go in it?
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 6/5/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> [taking to dev]
>
> There was an old QueryUtils class that was used for some internal
> obscure queries. It's long gone (don't even remember which version
> dumped it). So now we can reuse the name for the user-friendly
> utility class (if we decide to go this way).
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
> > Hasn't QueryUtils gone poof in 3.0?
> >
> > /dev/mrg
> >
> >
> > On 6/5/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> So where do we put it then? QueryUtils?
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 06 2007 - 10:15:31 EDT