I'm not really opposed, but I haven't looked much at the JPA stuff.
However, do we still have an unresolved issue with the password encoding? I
tried to subscribe to the Apache Legal mailing list several times and never
got added, so I could never take the question over there.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
PS. I'd advertise the new JPA/etc stuff as alpha-quality, but emphasis the
Cayenne Classic stuff is stable.
On 6/22/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> What's the consensus on making 3.0 M1 release?
>
> I think it is long overdue - we want to show the many things we've
> developed over the last 1+ year [1]. Also I just checked in the
> minimal EJBQL support so that users can play with it (that was my own
> minimal TODO). As before "M" (milestone) means an alpha quality
> release with unstable new features, "unstable" indicating that the
> new API can change over the course of the release.
>
> If nobody objects to going forward with M1, I will switch in the
> release preparation mode, testing the code across different
> databases, writing the docs, etc.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> [1] http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/guide-to-30-features.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jun 22 2007 - 12:08:46 EDT