Cool.
I am very much into "release often release early" philosophy, and I'd
like to start following it with 3.0 on both counts.
BTW, I just fixed a few remaining EJBQL join bugs that I found, so
now I will fully concentrate on cross-DB testing and the docs.
Andrus
On Jun 25, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I'm for it. I've been out of the 3.0 game for a little bit, but it
> seemed pretty stable the last time I tried it. It'd be helpful to get
> other people using it, too. Early adopters can provide plenty of JIRA
> goodness.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
>> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:24 AM
>> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
>> Subject: How about 3.0 M1?
>>
>> What's the consensus on making 3.0 M1 release?
>>
>> I think it is long overdue - we want to show the many things
>> we've developed over the last 1+ year [1]. Also I just
>> checked in the minimal EJBQL support so that users can play
>> with it (that was my own minimal TODO). As before "M"
>> (milestone) means an alpha quality release with unstable new
>> features, "unstable" indicating that the new API can change
>> over the course of the release.
>>
>> If nobody objects to going forward with M1, I will switch in
>> the release preparation mode, testing the code across
>> different databases, writing the docs, etc.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> [1] http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/guide-to-30-features.html
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jun 25 2007 - 12:52:12 EDT