On 22/06/2007, at 11:23 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> What's the consensus on making 3.0 M1 release?
As some of you know we've been using 3.0 in production since late
last year. We have no reliability problems at all and we've been
giving it a good workout. Derby and mySQL only, but running it on 1.4
and 1.5 on OSX, Windows, Linux and FreeBSD. We know that it works at
a basic level on Solaris.
My concern has long been that full JPA compliance is such a big goal,
that 3.0 might be some time off. So either we reduce the goals for
3.0 or keep releasing snapshots people could use in production.
Lachlan and I will try to make time to work on inheritance (now that
the requirements are clear thanks to everyone on this list) once we
get some other important work out of the way, but I'm thinking that
that will take some time to fully implement and test.
Also, we need to be clearer about terminology:
http://cayenne.apache.org/2007/03/08/version-30-milestones-and-
javadoc.html
That indicates that the snapshots already released are 'milestones'.
Will it be clear that cayenne-client-3.0-M1.jar is superior to
cayenne-client-3.0-20070227.124237-1.jar? Or should the naming just
continue on as date stamps?
Ari Maniatis
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
phone +61 2 9660 9700
PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jun 25 2007 - 19:48:31 EDT