Things went well for me with the upgrade. I even took the opportunity
to move from DataContext to ObjectContext in many locations. I'm liking
most of the new API, too. A couple things I'm still not too keen on,
but we can handle that separately.
The biggest thing I would like to see is the documentation examples
updated to use ObjectContext rather than DataContext. Aside from the
one blurb in the overview section, it would appear that DataContext is
still the preferred method.
Otherwise, I'm +1 for the release. It seems pretty solid as far as
traditional Cayenne is concerned. It'll be nice to get other people to
beat on it as well.
-- Kevin> -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Menard [mailto:kmenar..ervprise.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 12:59 PM > To: de..ayenne.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Cayenne Release 3.0M1 > > I've been a bit behind the ball, but I'm going to try to deploy 3.0M1 > into one of our production systems this week. That should give me a > good enough idea as to how I'm going to vote. > > -- > Kevin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org] > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:15 PM > > To: de..ayenne.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Cayenne Release 3.0M1 > > > > [VOTE: approve 3.0M1 release] > > > > I posted artifacts for 3.0M1 release here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M1/ > > > > There were almost no comments since I tagged M1. I've been > > cleaning things up, fixing various things (most notable is > > CAY-830 reported by Ari), doing more regression testing, etc. > > I think we are in a very good shape for a milestone release > > and I am anxious to get it out :-) > > > > Please take a looks and cast your votes. > > > > Thanks > > Andrus > > > > P.S. +1 > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Jul 22 2007 - 13:40:20 EDT