Have you actually read all the replies in this thread?
Andrus
On Nov 4, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Demetrios Kyriakis wrote:
>
>
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>>
>> There's nothing stopping you from forking a branch of DataViews.
>>
> Well, as I mentioned in the subject, I asked/proposed about a
> *move* not
> fork and of couse this "as official as possible" :).
> Personally I'm not interested in "forking" - I think there's not
> enough
> "developer free energy" around to invest in forks, and for sure not
> for
> "political" resons like licensing :).
>
> My request was based on a very simple and pragmatic reason - on
> sourceforge
> it takes only a single click to give someone commit rights - it's even
> simpler than explaining "house rules" or whatever bureacratic steps
> Apache
> takes.
>
>
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>>
>> However, you cannot change the license to LGPL.
>>
> Wow thank you for the info. I didn't know that Apache license is so
> restrictive.
> I think that LGPL code can be changed by the owners to whatever
> license they
> wish (if they wish).
> I think I saw this on some dev.java.net forum - Sun.com has LGPL
> for most
> code there, but they can change it to what they want and when they
> want.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Demetrios.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DataViews---
> Proposal---move-to-sourceforge%21-tf4743504.html#a13571863
> Sent from the Cayenne - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Nov 04 2007 - 06:52:53 EST