Andrus Adamchik commented on CAY-915:
-------------------------------------
> Off hand, I'm thinking of two new fields to the class generation panel in the modeler:
Wouldn't that be a property of an entity? (i.e. you'd want the same interface to be generated regardless of whether you run cgen Ant task, GUI generator, maven, etc.
> 1) Check box for indicating that the interfaces should be generated
> 2) A text field for specifying the package to use
Why not just a field with full interface name?
> Add ability to generate a common interface for client and server classes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAY-915
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-915
> Project: Cayenne
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: CayenneModeler GUI
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Kevin Menard
> Assignee: Kevin Menard
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently there is a divide between ROP client and server classes. Ultimately, it'd be nice to see some unification of the two. In some applications, however, there is compelling reason to keep two hierarchies separate. In that case, it may still be beneficial to have a common interface that other code can use to interact with both client and server classes.
> Off hand, I'm thinking of two new fields to the class generation panel in the modeler:
> 1) Check box for indicating that the interfaces should be generated
> 2) A text field for specifying the package to use
> This also implies modifications to both the client and server superclass velocity templates.
-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Nov 06 2007 - 11:36:21 EST