Well, I've made marginal progress there as well. I am wrestling with a
serialization problem right now. I know you had mentioned issues with
this earlier, but it's the object context that's behaving differently
from CayenneDataObject.
I've had a Tapestry 4 app that's used lists of CDOs in..or loops and
has just worked. As PersistentObjects, they lose their data context on
deserialization. No custom squeezers are involved. What's really
interesting is that the contexts are marked as transient in both CDO and
PO.
I suspect once that's squared away, the rest won't be nearly as bad.
-- Kevin-----Original Message----- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 3:53 AM To: de..ayenne.apache.org Subject: Re: Cleaning up ROP
Hi Kevin,
CayenneDataObject approach is fundamentally different from other persistent object implementations that are all variations of POJO. So I think a different approach may work better - using current client objects on the server (instead of using current server objects on the client).
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:16:11 EST