Re: DbRelationship and FK_NAME

From: Tore Halset (halse..vv.ntnu.no)
Date: Wed Dec 19 2007 - 06:23:02 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: DbRelationship and FK_NAME"

    On Dec 19, 2007, at 12:02 , Andrus Adamchik wrote:

    > Oh wait! FK_NAME is also available from a join right? (I was
    > thinking about "FK constraint name" when I sent my last email).

    Currently cayenne does not know the FK_NAME as it is not needed. It is
    only needed to drop the FK by the merger. And, this name is typically
    generated by the db (if you do not specify it upon create).

    > Yeah, let's probably use a non-public subclass if you need to store
    > extra info during a DbLoader run.

    Yes, I will create a subclass. Must probably be public as the DbLoader
    and the DbMerger exist in different packages or what?

    Regards,
      - Tore.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Dec 19 2007 - 06:23:49 EST