Re: [M3 issue] extended type on ROP

From: Aristedes Maniatis (ar..sh.com.au)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 10:32:43 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [M3 issue] extended type on ROP"

    On 22/01/2008, at 2:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

    >
    > On Jan 21, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    >> but it will be required on the client for any attributes which
    >> implement an extended type.
    >
    > To clarify, ExtendedType is a *descriptor* of another type. The type
    > has to be present on the client, while descriptor does not.
    >

    Yes, you are right. It just means that I have to compile the extended
    type against the cayenne server jar and then include the compiled
    class file into the client, which is not what I'm doing now. It might
    be a more convenient in my build environment to create a stub so I can
    compile it directly in the client application, but I'll see what is
    easiest.

    Ari

    -------------------------->
    ish
    http://www.ish.com.au
    Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
    phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
    GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jan 21 2008 - 10:33:28 EST