Re: Runtime relationships leak into CayenneModeler

From: Kevin Menard (kmenar..ervprise.com)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2008 - 13:44:38 EST

  • Next message: Jon Sharp (JIRA): "[JIRA] Created: (CAY-985) Cayenne 3.0M3 cayenne-server maven artifact lacks VPP"

    Cool.

    Yeah, there is definitely room to streamline there. I noticed a TODO not
    for pushing the mvn assemblies through. Maybe a simple bash script there
    would help?

    Actually, a simple bash script for the whole process would likely help.
    About the only thing that would need to be customized is the GPG key ID. 

    -- 
Kevin

    On 2/12/08 1:38 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:

    > 
> On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> 
>> I think the 4 - 6 week is a sweetspot.
>> As is, it takes us 2 - 3 weeks to get a release out the door.  So
>> waiting
>> upwards of 10 + 3 seems like a really long time to me.
> 
> So we are in agreement, as I really meant 10 - 3 (6-10 weeks as
> perceived by the users). As a side note, would be nice to cut down on
> the time we spend preparing the release. If we do it often enough, I
> suspect we'll have fewer issues with assemblies (something that I
> assume most of us are really testing vs. the testing actual framework
> code), so it is realistic to streamline the process.
> 
> Andrus
>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Feb 12 2008 - 13:45:12 EST