Again, I am not commenting on the substance of the issue
On Mar 15, 2008, at 10:13 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Yeah, the example is a little odd, but combined with runtime
> relationship
> created in CAY-1009 for base types, the situation does come up. A
> fix of
> CAY-1009 may mitigate the need for this. In which case, we could
> either
> explicitly disallow it or come up with a better alternative.
>
> Off-hand, I'm thinking a means of mapped queries that take the
> qualifier
> into account and cast results to the appropriate type. I suppose
> this would
> have more performance implications than just maintaining the list
> locally,
> but it should take care of any data integrity issues without getting
> too
> ugly.
>
>
> On 3/15/08 2:13 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 15, 2008, at 7:31 PM, kmenar..pache.org wrote:
>>
>>> <obj-relationship name="addresses" source="Employee"
>>> target="Address" db-relationship-path="employeeAddresses"/>
>>> + <obj-relationship name="homeAddresses" source="Employee"
>>> target="HomeAddress" db-relationship-path="employeeAddresses"/>
>>
>> Hmm.... I know for sure I never had such mapping (which explains why
>> the bug is there to begin with). Still formally the mapping is valid,
>> so I guess we'd have to handle it.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Mar 15 2008 - 17:10:02 EDT