On Mar 17, 2008, at 12:06 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I was also trying to avoid entity overload for the testing.
But I think that's what sort of happened in the quoted commits?
> The test cases
> are very much structured around being able to load a particular
> DataMap, so
> coming up with a new one means a new test case as well. Not
> necessarily a
> bad thing, just explaining a bit more.
I was thinking of adding new entities to the existing people DataMap.
This should be good enough to separate the test cases. Also we don't
have to keep using meaningful entity names (Person, Address), just
something like Entity1, Subentity1 should be ok. The only
consideration in naming is to avoid using the word Test in the names,
as this confuses Maven surefire sometimes.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Mar 16 2008 - 18:33:13 EDT