On Mar 28, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>
>> Question... Once we do that, would that mean that we only solved 50%
>> of the broken cases? Mapping cases showing remaining problems are
>> welcomed.
>
> I know that the patch I provided did fix a subset of cases for me.
> It did
> allow the test case for CAY-1009 to pass. It also allowed tests in
> my own
> app that's been blocked on the issue to pass. The test case for
> CAY-1008
> still fails though, so it clearly wouldn't address the problem
> globally.
It changed 'getReverseRelationship' which is a generic method not
specifically related to runtime relationships logic (and I must admit
I still don't fully understand the logic in the fix..) Anyways, what
I'm saying is that the caller of this method should be responsible for
making a decision whether a runtime relationship makes sense or not,
not the method itself.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Mar 28 2008 - 09:43:50 EDT