Although ... this would require us to clean up Ashwood from
commons.lang dep... Since Andriy doesn't seem to be coming back to
Java, I may actually fork the Ashwood code and do a bit of tweaking to
strip the parts we are not using for Cayenne and remove the commons-
lang dep.
Andrus
On Apr 11, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Hmm... we only use a handful of classes from commons-lang...
> ToStringBuilder, HashCodeBuilder, EqualsBuilder and a few more... I
> think I may simply pull them to "org.apache.cayenne.util" and drop
> the dependency. We'll end up with leaner Cayenne and fewer
> dependencies to manage.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Hi Borut,
>>
>> I wish we didn't have any dependencies at all :-) Especially now in
>> the days of Maven. Lagging with deps upgrade affects one group of
>> users, upgrading too eagerly affects another...
>>
>> Anyways, I am +1 in general. I'll let it sit here for a couple of
>> days, and if nobody tells us why such upgrade is a horrible idea,
>> I'll go ahead with it.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Borut Bolčina wrote:
>>> Andrus,
>>>
>>> can you please upgrade version in the cayenne 3.0M3 pom of the
>>> commons.lang
>>> library to 2.4. Cayenne depends on 2.1 version of this library.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Borut
>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Apr 11 2008 - 03:36:46 EDT