Oh, I didn't know that.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
wrote:
> I am all for it, but isn't Velocity dependent on commons-collections?
> (Velocity would be the last one standing, with SQLTemplate depending on it,
> I don't see how we can get rid of it).
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2008, at 1:41 AM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
> >
> > On a related issue is there an intention to break the dependency on
> > commons-collections. This is the JAR we have most issue with on
> > application
> > servers. Its something we can deal with by patching the app servers
> > shared
> > libraries, but when you are building "shrink wrap" style applications
> > its a
> > difficult thing for your customers to deal with.
> >
> > regards Malcolm Edgar
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> > andru..bjectstyle.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 14, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> > >
> > > Is it worth us putting *all* the dependencies into a repository
> > > somewhere
> > >
> > > > (Objectstyle or Apache?) or directly into svn so that we don't get
> > > > stung
> > > > again by library versions we depend on being removed from maven
> > > > repositories
> > > > or not being updated when we want them?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I wouldn't bother to put *all* deps (things like commons-collections
> > > or
> > > commons-lang generally exist on the shared repo, posted on time, and
> > > not
> > > removed), but Hessian is a special case. Yeah, let's put it on
> > > ObjectStyle.
> > > I'll do that tonight.
> > >
> > > Andrus
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 14 2008 - 18:50:03 EDT