Thinking it over, the proposed path looks fine. I was a little under the
weather the last time I looked and wanted to make a note so I didn't
forget about it later. I see Andrey has already submitted a patch, so
I'll poke around with it.
-- KevinOn Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:28:59 -0400, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Hi Kevin, > > Suggested procedure seems very straightforward regardless of whether the > relationship is one step or multi-step. What are you concerns about > many-to-many? > > Andrus > > On Jul 2, 2008, at 3:32 AM, Kevin Menard (JIRA) wrote: > >> Kevin Menard commented on CAY-1077: >> ----------------------------------- >> >> It would also be nice if we could make many-to-many relationships >> easier to handle. I think the proposed path will improve things quite >> a bit, but it may still be a little awkward dealing with the join >> tables. I'll have to think about that one a bit more. >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jul 08 2008 - 20:58:02 EDT