Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> Still I see no point to split the adapters that *we* provide from
> Cayenne runtime.
>
Well, I thought that with such a split, Cayenne could support directly and
"officially",
less DBs (but overall to support more DBs) so that the testing work (when
releasing) to be much faster.
If I saw correctly, the most of the work(taking a few days) before every
relase, was to test Cayenne on all
databases.
I believed that having "outsourced" the DB part (except a 2 few very used
ones - e.g. MySQL, etc.) would reduce the effort of the core team to
concentrate on the general things, and make faster release cycles.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> Also it will break DB auto-detection feature (the auto
> adapter).
>
You are right. If it breaks existing features than it is a very bad idea :(.
Sorry.
Toni.
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cayenne.dba.*-%3A-same-handling-like-drivers--tp18636163p18648079.html Sent from the Cayenne - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jul 25 2008 - 05:14:02 EDT