On 23/10/2008, at 1:46 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> We got a bunch of tasks closed and new tasks started since we had
> this discussion last time. So is everybody ok with tagging M5 or are
> there reasons to wait longer?
Absolutely. It has been long enough since M4. For that matter, once we
resolve the API changes surrounding generics, what is preventing a
release of 3.0? I think it would be good for the public visibility of
Cayenne to have a final release of 3.0 soon. If it were not for the
API effects of moving to generics m4 could well have been labelled 3.0
and this coming release 3.1.
I believe we are already advocating to people that they use 3.0M4 in
production, so we should formalise that with a properly labelled
release. Should we agree to:
3.0M5: next week
3.0M6: inheritance and prefetch (and other bits which are in progress
now), plus finalisation of generics
3.0 beta 1: no more API changes
I don't have the rights to create milestones in Jira, but some triage
work to organise remaining tasks might be useful.
Regards
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 22 2008 - 18:48:04 EDT