On Nov 8, 2008, at 2:32 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> 1. Should we point Jira emails to the svn list instead just like
> Confluence emails? I think that is better since it doesn't create so
> much noise. I don't want to discourage potential contributors from
> subscribing to this list. If so, I can't see where this setting
> lives in Jira.
+0. Either list is fine with me. It should be under "notification
schemes"
> 2. I've changed the default assignee from Andrus to 'unassigned' for
> new tasks. Any objections? That might make it clearer what is being
> worked on.
No objections.
> 3. I'll go through and assign all the M5 tasks which have been done
> and the ones I know are being worked on. If I feel like a mind-
> numbing task one night I'll do a few more earlier milestones as
> well. Any objections to this approach?
+1. A comments on the details: From experience using Jira as a release
management tool on a commercial project, I'd suggest setting "Fix
version" to the target milestone. Among other things this allows auto-
generation of the release notes. "Affects Version/s" on the other hand
should be the version <= "fix version" or null. For bugs, affected
version is usually a version where a bug was discovered. For the new
features it is more vague, and may even be left empty.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Nov 08 2008 - 07:09:17 EST