Re: Nested context on ROP proposal

From: Lachlan Deck (lachlan.dec..mail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2008 - 07:33:25 EST

  • Next message: Aristedes Maniatis: "Re: Nested context on ROP proposal"

    On 11/11/2008, at 11:12 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:

    > Are you suggesting developers to keep same validation on client &
    > server in
    > this case? Well, this means that we prefer first solution - to do
    > nothing
    > :-)

    Easy ;-)

    > Actually I can think of situations when special server validation is
    > needed - e.g. when it takes long time and will be much longer via ROP.

    Additionally when for security reasons it only makes sense on the
    server.

    > Still, I agree and think we should leave this as 'known limitation'.
    > In fact, beside this problem, I've already implemented nested
    > contexts and
    > hopefully will commit after M5 is released.

    Great.

    with regards,

    --
    

    Lachlan Deck



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Nov 11 2008 - 07:34:14 EST