Cool. If that's what culling is currently about, then I am +1.
So please treat the email that I sent on greying things out as an
optional nice-to-have feature suggestion for the future releases.
Andrus
On Nov 18, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> You're right, B->A must be to-one, not A->B.
>
> ARTIST.paintings.artist is the same object.
>
> 2008/11/18, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>:
>>
>> Hmm... not that I ever mapped a flattened relationship like that
>> myself,
>> but technically this is totally valid:
>>
>> ObjRelationship: Painting.peerPaintings
>>
>> mapped as
>>
>> DbRelationship Path: PAINTING.toArtist.paintings
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>>
>> A -> B -> A is culled (B -> A will not be shown) when relationships
>> are
>>> reverse to each other & A -> B is to-one (e.g. paintings -> Artist
>>> ->
>>> paintings)
>>>
>>> 2008/11/18, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I only was able to play with culling briefly, but it
>>>>
>>>>> looks to be cutting down my choices considerably, which is good.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> BTW, what's this about? Looks like I missed something.
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Nov 18 2008 - 09:25:12 EST