Re: [VOTE] 3.0M5 Release

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Thu Dec 11 2008 - 03:05:18 EST

  • Next message: Adrian Wiesmann: "Re: SwixML"

    +1 - Looking good.

    On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:

    > I've put up new artifacts for 3.0M5 that should address the problems
    > Tore and Andrus encountered.
    >
    > I refreshed on voting policy as well. Releases cannot be vetoed, so
    > we can push ahead with the release now. However, we are looking at
    > new artifacts, so I would like to see at least three +1 votes on the
    > new artifacts before we cut the release. The GPG sig and MD5
    > checksums should be rechecked as well.
    >
    > I will not be restarting the 72 hour window. Three +1 will do it.
    > I'd expect any other blocker issues to have been uncovered.
    >
    > --
    > Kevin
    >
    >
    >
    > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Tore Halset <halse..vv.ntnu.no>
    > wrote:
    >> Hello.
    >>
    >> -1
    >>
    >> as it breaks my production system as described in an email from me
    >> 5/12. I
    >> am currently tesing this with Andrus latest fix.
    >>
    >> - Tore.
    >>
    >> On Dec 2, 2008, at 14:10, Kevin Menard wrote:
    >>
    >>> Hi all,
    >>>
    >>> I'm raising the vote release Cayenne 3.0 M5. I've prepared and
    >>> signed
    >>> the 3.0M5 binaries and they are available here:
    >>>
    >>> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M5/
    >>>
    >>> Here is my +1 for the release.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> Kevin
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Dec 11 2008 - 03:05:57 EST