On 18/03/2009, at 8:47 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> After the initial excitement about JPA callbacks, now I feel like
> they are not all that flexible (not in the context of Cayenne
> anyways). At this point I won't suggest deviating from the JPA
> spec... Unless we entertain the possibility to bag JPA as a goal
> completely, instead of saying "we'll give it another try after 3.0".
> But until we "officially" make any such decision, we are bound by
> the spec in some of the features.
That doesn't stop us adding more callbacks in addition to the JPA
ones. Just because we want to keep those, doesn't mean we can't have
more useful ones as well. Certainly in ROP the existing callbacks are
even less useful. It would be nice to have some useful points of
access on both the client and the server.
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Mar 18 2009 - 06:46:26 EDT