The EJBQLQuery pane in the modeler appears to need some work, as well;
I haven't played with it extensively, but I put entered a valid query
and was informed by the modeler that the query was invalid (I use the
exact same query in my application with no issues)... haven't filed an
issue for this yet as I haven't had time to look into it deeper (maybe
there /was/ an issue with my query. :) I'd prefer that to be taken
care of before an M6 release, at least. I'll see if I can look into it
today and file an issue, if appropriate.
Robert
On Mar 30, 2009, at 3/303:57 AM , Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>>
>> Great. Then the main thing to do in the leadup to M6 is to look at
>> the list of tasks assigned to that milestone [1].
>>
>> Three Andrus, one Kevin and one me. Everyone, please add more tasks
>> you are planning to work on in the next fortnight to M6 or remove
>> anything from M6 which is unlikely to happen. Then we'll have a
>> clear goal.
>
>
> I just edited my issues. I'd like to finish CAY-1193. Olga is
> working on it, it mostly works, but still needs serious polishing.
>
>
>> Are there any show stoppers from Cayenne users which need to be
>> looked at for M6? Should we ask on the user list or will they just
>> tell us we need a graphical UML-like modeler? :-)
>
>
> I think we shouldn't. We don't have resources to react to user
> requests so quickly. Even to many of the valid ones.
>
> Andrus
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Mar 30 2009 - 13:02:12 EDT