NDA is not such a big hurdle for a potential contributor. You just
sign it and that's it. Somehow no such contributors materialized even
when JPA was a new frontier (compared to now when there's a bunch of
alternative providers, and we don't have a way to differentiate
ourselves).
The reasons for splitting that code are related to reducing the
overhead we will incur. Namely:
1. We need to get JPA out of the releases, including documentation.
(If we don't ship the libs, keeping the docs does not make sense).
2. Updating JPA classes as Cayenne core API evolves and ensuring all
the tests still pass requires extra effort. This is not a huge deal
now, but I expect it to become a drag in 3.1+, as we start diverging
from JPA in things like callbacks, etc.
But I agree that doing the proposed reorg is a strategical decision in
a sense that we are sending a clear signal to the community: there
will be no Cayenne JPA. At least this is honest. I am doing that
reluctantly, considering how many man-months I spent on that. The
consolation is that we filled the blanks in Cayenne core as a result,
while staying true to Cayenne user-friendly origins. This is something
to build upon.
Andrus
On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 06/04/2009, at 5:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Since we are not shipping JPA with 3.0, and further future of this
>> line of development is undefined, we need to make some decisions
>> now. I suggest doing what we did for DataViews - a separate
>> location in SVN, and a separate wiki space. If this effort is
>> revived (of which I have very strong doubts), we'll get it back to
>> the main subtree.
>
> What is the downside of just leaving it as is? The framework is
> nicely separated as a separate maven/eclipse project, and moving the
> documentation to be a second class citizen will only discourage
> anyone else from working on it.
>
> As it is, there is perhaps more chance of someone finding it
> interesting and working on it, although the hurdles of signing the
> NDA, etc make that less likely.
>
> Ari
>
>
>
> -------------------------->
> ish
> http://www.ish.com.au
> Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
> phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 05:06:29 EDT