On Apr 9, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> But I really feel that Cayenne should rise another strict "plan for
> 3.0". It's much simplier to tell users that Cayenne's going to grow
> and
> improve when you have one.
For 3.0 it is mostly finishing the features that are already there. Of
course we are in a feature creep situation, when instead of finishing
the existing features, we start the new ones, previously unexpected
(case in point, me initiating schema update strategy and Cayenne
monitoring tasks recently)... :-/
Otherwise the list is probably along the lines of "(1) implement the
inheritance ; (2) fix bugs".
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Apr 11 2009 - 06:55:13 EDT