Re: hessian as a separate solution?

• Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: hessian as a separate solution?"
• Maybe in reply to: Joseph Schmidt: "hessian as a separate solution?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thank you for your reply,
> >> Would you please consider releasing that "generic"
> part of
> >> ROP (those nice improvements to hessian) as an
> independent
> >> library that would not depend on Cayenne, but only
> on
> >> Hessian?
>
> Probably not,
I see :(.

> but nothing should prevent an interested
> party to extract needed parts of code and do it on their
> own. It is released under the Apache license after all.
Another advantage of having that functionality independently would be that users who would want to use Cayenne-ROP with JSON (like it was expressed on these lists - cayenne members I guess), could just swap the JARs(to a JSON implementation) and use than directly ROP with e.g. Google GWT or ExtJS or Adobe RIA or other RIA (since most of them seems to use JSON).

thanks,
Joseph.

• Next message: Joseph Schmidt: "Re: maven plugin for importing DB schema"
• Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: hessian as a separate solution?"
• Maybe in reply to: Joseph Schmidt: "hessian as a separate solution?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Apr 12 2009 - 12:26:07 EDT